Thursday, May 31, 2012

Forced medication case reaches Supreme Court. (Spotlight on Newer Antipsychotics)

Friday, May 18, 2012

Supreme court ruling on HMOs irks physicians.(News): An article from: Clinical

Supreme Court rules employer needn't rehire recovered drug user.: An article

Monday, May 14, 2012

Supreme Court to take up health reform.(NEWS): An article from: Internal

Arizona's Immigration Law Heads to the Supreme Court



"As long as there is not a direct conflict, which the federal government did not do a very good job of pointing to today, the Arizona law gets to stand under the Preemption Doctrine," says Reason's Damon Root, who was at the Supreme Court during Wednesday's oral arguments surrounding Arizona's controversial immigration law. "The federal government is saying that 'we have the power to stomp out all of the state experiments in immigration law enforcement.'" Much like the Health Care arguments before the Court in March, Root does not see this as a good day for the Obama administration, in part due to Solicitor General Donald Verrilli's poor performance. "At one point," Root explains "Justice Sotomayor interrupted [Verrilli] and said "look I am terribly confused by what you are saying." Runs about 3.50 minutes. Produced by Meredith Bragg. For more of Reason.tv's coverage of immigration, go here: reason.com Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube Channel to receive automatic updates when new material goes live.

Who really benefits from any willing provider laws? The Supreme Court says it's a state's right, but is it good policy?


This digital document is an article from Behavioral Health Management, published by Medquest Communications, LLC on May 1, 2003. The length of the article is 723 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Who really benefits from any willing provider laws? The Supreme Court says it's a state's right, but is it good policy? (Feature Article).
Author: Monica E. Oss
Publication: Behavioral Health Management (Magazine/Journal)
Date: May 1, 2003
Publisher: Medquest Communications, LLC
Volume: 23 Issue: 3 Page: 30(2)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Monday, May 7, 2012

Some call for ACA's review by Supreme Court.(NEWS)(Patient Protection and

The Supreme Court rules: The FDA and tobacco regulation. (Health Policy

Friday, May 4, 2012

How Olmstead impacts state mental health policy: courts are attempting

How Olmstead impacts state mental health policy: courts are attempting to balance the interests of community-based clients and state taxpayers.: An article from: Behavioral Health Management [HTML] [Digital]

Product Details

  • Format: HTML
  • Printable: Yes
  • Mac OS Compatible: Yes
  • Windows Compatible: Yes
  • Handheld Compatible: Yes
  • File Size: 16 KB
  • Digital: 8 pages
  • Publisher: Medquest Communications, LLC (July 31, 2005)

By : Jeffrey L. Poston (Author), Daniel M. Creekman (Author)
Price : $5.95
How Olmstead impacts state mental health policy: courts are attempting to balance the interests of community-based clients and state taxpayers.: An article from: Behavioral Health Management [HTML] [Digital]

 

How Olmstead impacts state mental health policy: courts are attempting to balance the interests of community-based clients and state taxpayers.: An article from: Behavioral Health Management [HTML] [Digital]

 


Related Product


MOSES, TEN, COMMANDMENTS, SUPREME, COURT Card
Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration [Hardcover]